Water use optimization in tepetate renders through the use of polysaccharides
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33064/iycuaa2026988348Keywords:
Sustainable construction, tepetate, earth renders, water efficiency, bioprospecting, polysaccharidesAbstract
Earth renders, historically used to protect adobe, wattle-and-daub, and rammed earth buildings, have lost their construction tradition due to massive cement adoption. Tepetate, a volcanic soil abundant in Mexico, represents a sustainable alternative but demands high water volumes to achieve adequate workability. The construction industry consumes approximately 16% of global freshwater, and in Mexico, where 76% of the territory experiences moderate to severe drought conditions, optimizing water use is an imperative necessity. This study optimizes water use in tepetate renders through heteropolysaccharides from Mexican endemic plants and industrial glycerol. Optimized formulations achieved water reductions up to 65%. Agave mucilage at 0.5% reached compressive strengths of 42.09 kg/cm² (157% higher than control), while glycerol formulations at 1.5% demonstrated exceptional resistance to surface water impact (422 vs. 5 minutes). This approach establishes a replicable model for bio-construction and sustainable heritage restoration in arid regions.
Downloads
References
• Aghdam, A. B., Kamyab, H., Yuzir, A., Aghdam, E. B., & Chelliapan, S. (2023). Reviewing the role of water in sustainable construction: Water footprint assessment and reduction strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137563.
• Ahmed, H., Tizani, W., Mohammed, A., & Kurda, R. (2023). Water scarcity and sustainable construction: A systematic review of water recycling in building materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106847.
• Ali, M., et al. (2024). Water footprint reduction in construction materials: A comprehensive review of sustainable practices. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 39, e00583.
• Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587-612.
• Anand, C. K., & Amor, B. (2022). Recent advances in bio-based building materials. Materials Today Sustainability, 18, 100144.
• Arrigoni, A., Pelosato, R., Melià, P., Ruggieri, G., Sabbadini, S., & Dotelli, G. (2017). Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: The role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of rammed earth and straw bale techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 189-207.
• Benítez-Malvido, J., Martínez-Falcón, A. P., Dattilo, W., & González-DiPierro, A. M. (2018). The role of plant diversity and chemical defense in ecological restoration. Plant Ecology, 219(5), 537-551.
• Berardi, U. (2017). A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and their trends. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 123, 230-241.
• Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology (3ª ed.). Routledge.
• Cardeño, F., Gallego, L. J., & Rios, L. A. (2011). Refinación de la fase glicerina del biodiesel de aceite de palma empleando ácidos minerales. Información Tecnológica, 22(6), 15-24.
• Chandra, S., & Eklund, L. (2020). Cactus mucilage as sustainable bio-additive in concrete: A comprehensive review. Construction and Building Materials, 247, 118631.
• Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. (2020). La biodiversidad en México: Síntesis de conocimiento actual, evaluación y perspectivas de sustentabilidad.
• Comisión Nacional del Agua. (2023). Atlas del agua en México 2023. https://www.gob.mx/conagua/documentos/atlas-del-agua-en-mexico
• Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J., & Collen, B. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345(6195), 401-406.
• Flores-Vivián, I., Hejazi, V., Kozhukhova, M. I., Nosonovsky, M., & Sobolev, K. (2013). Self-assembling particle-siloxane coatings for superhydrophobic concrete. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 5(13), 6247-6253.
• Gama-Castro, J. (2007). Los tepetates y su dinámica sobre la degradación y el riesgo ambiental: El caso del Glacis de Buenavista, Morelos. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 59(1), 133-145.
• García-Alonso, L., & Ruvalcaba, J. L. (2020). Research and conservation of bio-cultural heritage and traditional technologies. En 47th Conference of CIMUSET (pp. 116-125). CIMUSET.
• García-alonso, L., Vázquez, M., & Guerrero, L. (2025). Enhancing tepetate renders with endemic plant mucilage and safe additives: a sustainable approach to architectural conservation. ArtGRID - Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts, 7(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.57165/artgrid.1563266
• García-Mendoza, A. J., Ordóñez, M. J., & Briones-Salas, M. (Eds.). (2004). Biodiversidad de Oaxaca. Instituto de Biología, UNAM-Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund.
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.
• González, A., Guerrero, L., & Quiroa, J. (2024). Bajareque tecnificado. Evaluación de agua incorporada en comparación con la edificación convencional. Limaq, 14, 145-167.
• González-Cortázar, M., Herrera-Ruiz, M., Zamilpa, A., Jiménez-Ferrer, E., Tortoriello, J., & Alvarez, L. (2021). Mucilage from Opuntia species as natural additive for construction materials: A review of traditional knowledge and scientific validation. Industrial Crops and Products, 171, 113896.
• Guerrero, L. (2018). Identificación y valoración del patrimonio precolombino construido con tierra modelada. Anales del Instituto de Arte Americano e Investigaciones Estéticas Mario J. Buschiazzo, 48(1), 125-141.
• Guerrero, L., & Ávila Boyas, E. (2019). Pañetes de tierra estabilizada con nopal. Revista Nodo, 14(27), 53-62.
• Guerrero, L., Ávila, E., & García-Alonso, L. (2022). El glicerol como estabilizante de revoques de tierra. Estoa. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Cuenca, 11(21), 83-97.
• Huang, B., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, X. (2022). Climate-adaptive building materials: A review of bio-based solutions for water management. Building and Environment, 208, 108594.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the sixth assessment report. Cambridge University Press.
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.
• Koleff, P., Urquiza-Haas, T., & Contreras, B. (2012). Prioridades de conservación de los bosques tropicales en México: reflexiones sobre su estado de conservación y manejo. Ecosistemas, 21(1-2), 6-20.
• Mahmood, A., Ahmad, S., Khan, M. A., Mirza, J., & Shah, S. N. (2024). Enhancing concrete properties with Agave americana fiber reinforcement. ACS Omega, 9(8), 9456-9467.
• Martínez-López, M., García-Hernández, C., Ruiz-Terán, F., & Villalobos-Pietrini, R. (2023). Traditional ecological knowledge of Agave lechuguilla sustainable management in Northern Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 19(1), 1-15.
• Miller, S. A., Horvath, A., & Monteiro, P. J. (2018). Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 69-76.
• Ogunbode, E. B., Coker, A. O., & Sridhar, M. K. (2022). Water conservation in the building and construction industry: A systematic review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 47, 102723.
• Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710-718.
• Ramírez-Villegas, J., Molero Milan, A., Alexandrov, N., Asseng, S., Challinor, A. J., Crossa, J., van Eeuwijk, F., Ghanem, M. E., Grenier, C., Heinemann, A. B., Kelly, A. M., Kholová, J., Kroupin, P. Y., Mallikarjuna Swamy, B. P., Ndikumana, T., Quiroz, R., Rodriguez, M., Roorkiwal, M., Sonder, K.,... Reynolds, M. (2020). Climate change impacts on Mexican agriculture: Evidence from panel data. Agricultural Systems, 177, 102697.
• Rodríguez-Hernández, A. I., Muñoz-Muñoz, F., Guarneros-Peña, S. R., & Ibarra-Junquera, V. (2019). Cactus mucilage as an efficient natural flocculant to treat synthetic dairy wastewater. ACS Omega, 4(19), 18165-18173.
• Sarukhán, J., Koleff, P., Carabias, J., Soberón, J., Dirzo, R., Llorente-Bousquets, J., Halffter, G., González, R., March, I., Mohar, A., Anta, S., & de la Maza, J. (2017). Capital natural de México: Síntesis, evaluación del conocimiento actual, escenarios y sustentabilidad. CONABIO.
• Toledo, V. M., & Barrera-Bassols, N. (2017). Political agroecology in Mexico: A path toward sustainability. Sustainability, 9(2), 268.
• UN-Water. (2023). The United Nations world water development report 2023: Partnerships and cooperation for water. UNESCO.
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Building materials and climate change: How the construction sector can contribute to climate goals.
• Vandebroek, I., Pieroni, A., Stepp, J. R., Hanazaki, N., Ladio, A., Alves, R. R., Picking, D., Delgoda, R., Maroyi, A., van Andel, T., Quave, C. L., Paniagua-Zambrana, N. Y., Bussmann, R. W., Odonne, G., Abbasi, A. M., Albuquerque, U. P., Baker, J., Kutz, S., Timsina, S.,... Hurrell, J. A. (2019). Medicinal plant knowledge in three Mexican communities: Consensus within diversity. PLoS One, 14(6), e0218091.
• Vázquez-Barrios, V., & Martínez, M. L. (2020). Mexican endemic plants and their potential for bioprospecting in sustainable construction. Botanical Sciences, 98(3), 445-462.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lilian García-Alonso Alba, Luis Fernando Guerrero-Baca, Mónica Vázquez-Martínez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The papers published in electronic version of the journal are under the license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)