Electronic voting: reliability and implementation of technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33064/iycuaa2017701854Keywords:
electronic voting, reliability, cost and technologyAbstract
Electronic voting has become important in Mexico, since there have been studies for inclusion in the voting in Mexico. This paper presents an analysis of reliability and the use of technology in this process, its social and economic implication was performed. The population were Mexican voters, using opinion surveys applied by the Center for Social Studies and Public Opinion of the Chamber of Deputies. Being the sample of 1,400 voters with an average age of 38 years, and the proportion of men and women was the same. Among the most important results it stands out that the majority of respondents have a valid electoral ID card, and believes that electronic voting is easier to manipulate the results, but if this was used, voting would be considered more reliable in person through electronic voting machines installed in suitable locations.
Downloads
Metrics
References
• ARTERTON, C. Teledemocracy: can technology protect democracy? Newbury Park, California, US: SAGE publications, 1987.
• BRAUN, N. E-voting: Switzerland’s projects and their legal framework. In A. PROSSER & R. KRIMMER (Ed.), Electronic voting in Europe: Technology, law, politics and society. Workshop of the ESF TED Programme together with GI and OCG. July, 7th-9th 2004 in SchloB Hofen/Bregenz, Lake of Constance, Austria (43-52). Bonn, Germany: GI, 2004.
• BRAUN, N. y BRÄNDLI, D. Swiss e-voting pilot projects: Evaluation, situation analysis and how to proceed. In R. KRIMMER (Ed.), Electronic voting 2006, GI lecture notes in informatics (27-36). Bonn, Germany: GI, 2006.
• CAPORUSSO, L. There is more to e- than meets the eye: Towards automated voting in Italy. In J. M. RENIU (Ed.), E-voting: The last electoral revolution (27-44). Barcelona, Spain: ICPS, 2008.
• FAIRWEATHER, B. y ROGERSON, S. Internet voting-Well at least it’s modern. Representation, 39(3): 182-195, 2003.
• FALCÃO E CUNHA, J. et al. Auditing e-voting pilot processes and systems at the elections for the European Parliament and for the Portuguese Parliament. In J. M. RENIU (Ed.), E-voting: The last electoral revolution (93-114). Barcelona, España: ICPS, 2008.
• FERNÁNDEZ RODRÍGUEZ, J. J. et al. Voto electrónico. Estudio comparado en una aproximación jurídico-política (desafíos y posibilidades). Santiago de Querétaro, México: Fundación Universitaria de Derecho, Administración y Política, 2007.
• FROMM, E. The sane society. New York, US: Rinehart, 1955.
• FULLER, B. R. No more secondhand God. US: Southern Illinois University Press, 1963.
• GUTIÉRREZ DIEZ, M. C. y SALCIDO ORNELAS, D. Factores que influyen sobre percepciones de confianza y participación en elecciones a través del voto electrónico. Chihuahua, México: Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, 2015.
• GIBSON, R. Internet voting and the European Parliament’s elections: Problems and prospects. In A. TRECHSEL & F. MENDEZ (Eds.), The European Union and e-voting: Addressing the European Parliament’s internet voting challenge. London, UK: Routledge, 2005.
• KENSKI, K. To I-vote or not to I-vote? Opinions about internet voting from Arizona voters. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3): 293-303, 2005.
• MADISE, Ű. y MARTENS, T. E-voting in Estonia 2005. The first practice of country-wide binding internet voting in the world. In R. KRIMMER (Ed.), Electronic voting 2006, GI lecture notes in informatics (15-26). Bonn, Germany: GI, 2006.
• OOSTVEEN, A. M. Context matters. A social informatics perspective on the design and implications of large-scale e-government systems. Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam, 2007.
• OOSTVEEN, A. M. Outsourcing democracy: losing control of e-voting in the Netherlands. Policy & Internet, 2(4): 201-220, 2010.
• PREVOST, A. K. y SCHAFFNER, B. F. Digital divide or just another absentee ballot? Evaluating internet voting in the 2004 Michigan democratic primary. American Politics Research, 36(4): 510-529, 2008.
• RHEINGOLD, H. The virtual community. Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA, US: Addison-Wesley, 1993.
• SOLOP, F. I. Digital democracy comes of age: Internet voting and the 2000 Arizona democratic primary election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 34(2): 289-293, 2001.
• UDRIS, J. The Lithuanian concept of voting via internet for elections and referenda. Presentation held at the Council of Europe on account of the Central Electoral Commission of the Republic of Lithuania, November 16, in Strasbourg, France. Bonn, Germany: GI, 2006.
• XENAKIS, A. y MACINTOSH, A. Trust analysis of the UK e-voting pilots. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3): 312-325, 2005.
• ZISSIS, D. y LEKKAS, D. Securing e-Government and e-voting with an open cloud computing architecture. Goverment Information Quarterly, 28(2): 239-251, 2011.
De páginas electrónicas
• BUENDÍA, J. Los fundamentos de la opinión pública. En El Colegio de México (Ed.), Los grandes problemas de México: XIV. Instituciones y procesos políticos (303-330). 2010. Recuperado en febrero de 2015, de http://2010.colmex.mx/tomos2.html
• CESOP (CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES Y DE OPINIÓN PÚBLICA DE LA CÁMARA DE DIPUTADOS). Encuestas. Diciembre de 2014. Recuperado en febrero de 2015, de http://www5.diputados. gob.mx/index.php/camara/Centros-de-Estudio/CESOP/Opinion-Publica/Encuestas
• COMMISSION ON ELECTRONIC VOTING. First report of the Commission on Electronic Voting on secrecy, accuracy and testing of the chosen electronic voting system. 2004a. Recuperado de http://www.umic.pt/images/stories/publicacoes1/00Index.pdf
• COMMISSION ON ELECTRONIC VOTING. Interim report of the Commission on Electronic Voting on secrecy, accuracy and testing of the chosen electronic voting system. 2004b. Recuperado de http://www.umic.pt/images/stories/publicacoes1/V02.pdf
• CREELAN, J. y NORDEN, L. The requirements of New York University School of Law. Noviembre 2 de 2005. Recuperado de www.wheresthepaper.org/
• GONGGRIJP, R. et al. Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer. A security analysis. Spoedcursus stemcomputers. Wij vertrouwen stem computers niet. October 2006. Recuperado de http://wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/other/es3b-en.pdf
• GUERRA, G. A. y ZIZZO, D. J. Economics of trust in the information economy: Issues of identity, privacy and security. Research Report No. 1. Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, 2003. Recuperado de https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/archive/downloads/publications/RR1.pdf
• INE (INSTITUTO NACIONAL ELECTORAL)-COLMEX (EL COLEGIO DE MÉXICO). Informe país sobre la calidad de la ciudadanía en México. 2015. Recuperado en febrero de 2015, de http://www.ine.mx/archivos2/s/DECEYEC/EducacionCivica/Resumen_Ejecutivo_23nov.pdf
• MARTÍ I. PUIG, S. Ciudadanía y cultura política en México a dos sexenios de la “alternancia”. Foro Internacional, LII(4): 864-884, 2012. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/599/59929086005.pdf
• REYES, A. El reto de los valores, percepciones y prácticas ciudadanas: Informe País. El Semanario, 23 de agosto de 2014. Recuperado en febrero de 2015, de http://elsemanario.com/69606/el-reto-de-los-valores-percepciones-y-practicasciudadanas-informe-pais/
• VERGARA LOPE TRISTÁN, S. y HEVIA DE LA JARA, F. J. Para medir la participación. Construcción y validación del Cuestionario Conductas de Participación (CCP). Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (UNAM), LVII(215): 35-67, 2012. Recuperado en 2014, de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42125325002
• WORLD E-DEMOCRACY FORUM (2008). Estonia to vote by mobile phone in 2011. Recuperado de http://www.edemocracy-forum.com/2008/12/estonia-to-vote-bymobilephone-in-2011.html
• WVS (WORLD VALUES SURVEY ASSOCIATION). World Values Survey Wave 5 2005-2008 Official Aggregate v.20140429. Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid, Spain, 2005. Recuperado de www.worldvaluessurvey.org
Downloads
Published
License
Las obras publicadas en versión electrónica de la revista están bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
