Ciencias o cientificismo: una elección ética

Authors

  • Dolores Aldana Villavicencio Centro de Estudios Psicoanalíticos Mexicano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33064/ippd63077

Keywords:

science, scientism, dogmatism, reductionism, difference

Abstract

Science in a broad sense does not seem to predominate today; unfortunately for humanity, scientism does. But when generalizations are made and the subjects who do science are confused with those who adopt the scientist position, thinking of the "scientists" as the enemy to be defeated, are they not as confused in thought as the scientistics? Aren't the later as dogmatic as the former? It is suggested that the first thing to do is to clarify the difference; the second, to recognize what humanity owes to the sciences, and the third, to question all kinds of "isms".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abbagnano, N. (1961/2000). Diccionario de Filosofía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Aristóteles (2008). Física, libro III. Madrid: Ed. Gredos.
Charbonnat, P. (2002). Historia de las filosofías materialistas. Madrid: Sillepse.
Feixas, G. (2018). La personalidad. Ciudad de México: Salvat.
Huxley, A. (1932/2019). Un mundo feliz. Barcelona: Penguin Random.
Laurent, E. (2014). Lost in cognition. New York: Routledge.
Nietzsche, F. (1872/2010). El nacimiento de la tragedia. Buenos Aires: Caronte.
Nietzsche, F. (1873/2010). Sobre verdad y mentira en sentido extramoral. Madrid: Técnos.
Pascal, B. (1670/2012). Pensamientos. Madrid: Gredos.

Published

2020-12-03

How to Cite

Aldana Villavicencio, D. (2020). Ciencias o cientificismo: una elección ética. Investigación Y Práctica En Psicología Del Desarrollo, 6, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.33064/ippd63077

Issue

Section

Artículos teóricos