Narrative statements in history and the problem of historical objectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33064/hh.vi7.1224Keywords:
demarcation, philosophy, narrative, History, science, objectivityAbstract
Using the problem of demarcation in philosophy of science, in the present work the author intends to make an analysis of the narrative statements to verify a possible relationship between them and the degree of historical objectivity, in order to determine their validity as a science. The narrative analysis is carried out on the basis of the differentiation between philosophies of history presented by Arthur C. Danto in his work Analytical philosophy of history, with the aim of reaching a result that can determine whether history is a science after all.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following term:
The copyright of any article in Horizonte Histórico belongs to the author(s). As a condition of publication, authors agree to release their copyright under a shared license, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 International license.