Narrative statements in history and the problem of historical objectivity

Authors

  • Jesús Ernesto Macías Gil Autonomous University of Aguascalientes, Mexico.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33064/hh.vi7.1224

Keywords:

demarcation, philosophy, narrative, History, science, objectivity

Abstract

Using the problem of demarcation in philosophy of science, in the present work the author intends to make an analysis of the narrative statements to verify a possible relationship between them and the degree of historical objectivity, in order to determine their validity as a science. The narrative analysis is carried out on the basis of the differentiation between philosophies of history presented by Arthur C. Danto in his work Analytical philosophy of history, with the aim of reaching a result that can determine whether history is a science after all.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jesús Ernesto Macías Gil, Autonomous University of Aguascalientes, Mexico.

Eighth semester student of the Bachelor of Philosophy.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

How to Cite

Macías Gil, Jesús Ernesto. 2013. “Narrative Statements in History and the Problem of Historical Objectivity”. Horizonte Histórico - Semester Journal for Students of the UAA’s Bachelor’s Degree in History, no. 7 (January):61-67. https://doi.org/10.33064/hh.vi7.1224.

Issue

No. 7 (2013): Traditions, Customs and Daily Life

Section

Articles

License

Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following term:

The copyright of any article in Horizonte Histórico belongs to the author(s). As a condition of publication, authors agree to release their copyright under a shared license, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 International license.

Licencia de Creative Commons