De la métrica económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida: Propuesta feminista sobre el bienestar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33064/36euph8892Palabras clave:
bienestar, feminismos, justicia relacional, cuidados, interdependencia, políticas públicasResumen
Este artículo examina críticamente las teorías tradicionales del bienestar desde
perspectivas feministas, argumentando que las concepciones dominantes —
centradas en la autonomía individual, el ingreso económico y las métricas
cuantitativas — reproducen jerarquías de género y exclusiones estructurales al
asumir un sujeto abstracto y universal. Frente a esto, el trabajo muestra que las
propuestas feministas no solo amplían las dimensiones consideradas relevantes para
evaluar el bienestar, sino que transforman sus bases onto-epistémicas y normativas
al situarlo en relaciones de interdependencia, cuidado y justicia social. A partir de un
diálogo con autoras como Martha Nussbaum, Judith Butler e Ingrid Robeyns, así
como con enfoques provenientes de la economía del cuidado y el ecofeminismo,
argumento que el bienestar debe comprenderse como un proceso relacional y
situado, sostenido en vínculos de solidaridad, en la diversidad de cuerpos y
experiencias, y en la sostenibilidad de la vida en sus dimensiones materiales,
simbólicas y ecológicas. Asimismo, analizo la traducción de estas perspectivas en
políticas públicas, mostrando que la medición y el diseño institucional del bienestar
implican decisiones normativas que pueden ampliar o restringir las condiciones de
lo vivible. En este sentido, este trabajo propone entender el bienestar no como un
estado fijo ni como una mera métrica evaluativa, sino como un horizonte político
colectivo orientado a la ampliación de formas de vida dignas y a la construcción de
sociedades más justas, plurales y sostenibles.
Descargas
Citas
Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (2006). New foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Harvard
University Press.
Alkire, S. (2016). The capability approach and well-being measurement for public
policy. In M. D. Adler & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of well-being
and public policy (pp. 615–644). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.18
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of
matter and meaning. Duke university Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/597741
Bastia, T. (2014). Intersectionality, migration and development. Progress in
development studies, 14(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414521330
Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. (2015). Gender, development and globalization:
Economics as if all people mattered. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107935
Bentham, J. (2000). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Batoche
Books. (Trabajo original publicado en 1781)
Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood
penalty. Gender & society, 24(5), 616-646.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142
Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017). Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering
oppression. Pluto Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities:
Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health.
American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750
Burnham, T. C., & Phelan, J. (2023). Biological welfare economics: A natural science
critique of normative economics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 25(1), 1-33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-023-09333-x
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
Butler, J. (2009). Performativity, precarity and sexual politics. AIBR. Revista de
Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.040305
Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Harvard University
Press.
Cabnal, L. (2010). Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento
epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya
Yala. Momento de paro Tiempo de Rebelión, 116(3), 14-17. https://rosalux-
ba.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/minervasfinal2PAGINAS.pdf
Chambers, C. P., & Echenique, F. (2025). Empirical welfare economics. Theoretical
Economics, 20(3), 911-939. https://doi.org/10.3982/TE5845
Chant, S. (2016). Women, girls and world poverty: empowerment, equality or
essentialism? International Development Planning Review, 38(1), 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2016.1
Chappell, R., Meissner, D., & MacAskill, W. (2024). An Introduction to Utilitarianism:
From Theory to Practice. Hackett Publishing.
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual review of
sociology, 41(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
Coyle, D., Fabian, M., Beinhocker, E., Besley, T., & Stevens, M. (2023). Is it time to
reboot welfare economics? Overview. Fiscal Studies, 44(2), 109-121.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12334
Crenshaw, K. (1997). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and
Violence Against. The Legal Response to Violence Against Women, 5, 91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Crisp, R. (2002). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Mill on utilitarianism. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203410615
De La Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human
worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1mmfspt
Duran, A., & Pérez II, D. (2019). The multiple roles of chosen familia: Exploring the
interconnections of queer Latino men’s community culturalwealth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(1), 67-84.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1523484
Dworkin, R. (2001). What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. In The notion of
equality (pp. 81-142). Routledge. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2264894
Elson, D. (1999). Labor markets as gendered institutions: equality, efficiency and
empowerment issues. World development, 27(3), 611-627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00147-8
England, P., & Folbre, N. (1999). The cost of caring. The Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 39-51.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100103
Eschle, C. (2004). Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing
Solidarity. American Anthropologist, 106(3), 627.
https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.627
Esquivel, V. (2014). What is a transformative approach to care, and why do we need
it? Gender & Development, 22(3), 423-439.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.963303
Esquivel, V. (2011). La economía del cuidado en América Latina. PNUD.
https://evaluacionyseguimientoproyectosindesol.wordpress.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/09/ind15_atando_cabos.pdf
Federici, S. (2020). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist
struggle. PM press.
Federici, S. (2018a). El patriarcado del salario. Críticas feministas al marxismo. Madrid:
Traficantes de sueños.
Federici, S. (2018b). Re-enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons.
PM Press.
Fish, J. (2007). Getting equal: the implications of new regulations to prohibit sexual
orientation discrimination for health and social care. Diversity and Equality in
Health and Care, 4(3).
Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal
of Economic literature, 47(4), 1029-1075. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.1029
Folbre, N. (2011). The invisible heart: Care and the global economy. En N. Kabeer &
A. Stark (Eds.), The women, gender and development reader (pp. 41–42). London:
Zed Books.
Folbre, N. (2005). Valuing Care: A Feminist Critique of Global Capitalism. In draft
notes for presentation at Invited Session, Women's Worlds 2005 International
Conference, Seoul Korea, June.
https://aaws07.org/english3/speech/4.3.NancyFolber.pdf
Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis.
Verso Books.
Fraser, N. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional
approach to gender justice. Studies in social justice, 1(1), 23-35.
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v1i1.979
Fraser, N., & Lamas, M. (1991). La lucha por las necesidades: esbozo de una teoría
crítica socialista-feminista de la cultura política del capitalismo tardío. Debate
feminista, 3, 3-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42623971
Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. Women's Studies International
Forum, 49, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004
Gatrell, C., Cooper, C. L., & Kossek, E. E. (2017). Maternal bodies as taboo at work:
New perspectives on the marginalizing of senior-level women in
organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 239-252.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0034
Hajad, V., & Ikhsan, I. (2024). Ecofeminism as a movement: Choosing between
economics and nature protection. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic
Fields, 15(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.1(29).09
Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining
intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on politics, 5(1), 63-79.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065
Hands, D. W. (2012). The positive-normative dichotomy and economics. Handbook of
the Philosophy of Science, 13, 219-239.
https://www.dwadehands.com/uploads/1/4/0/5/140531545/positive-
normative_2012.pdf
Harcourt, W. (2023). The ethics and politics of care: reshaping economic thinking
and practice. Review of Political Economy, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2023.2241395
Harsanyi, J. C. (1977). Rule utilitarianism and decision theory. Erkenntnis, 11(1), 25-
53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169843
Harvey, J. T. (2010). Neoliberalism, neoclassicism and economic welfare. Journal of
Economic Issues, 44(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624440208
Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2007). The philosophical foundations of
mainstream normative economics. The philosophy of economics: an
anthology, 226, 247. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.017
Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto press. (Trabajo original
publicado en 1984).
Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and empowerment: A proposal for
internationally comparable indicators. Oxford development studies, 35(4), 379-
403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701897
Kittay, E. F. (2019). Love's labor: Essays on women, equality and dependency. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108926
Kittay, E. F. (2005). At the margins of moral personhood. Ethics, 116(1), 100-131.
Kittay, E. F. (2001). When caring is just and justice is caring: Justice and mental
retardation. Public Culture, 13(3), 557-579. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/26257
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford
University Press.
Little, I. M. D. (2002). A critique of welfare economics. Oxford University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Alba Marcela Zárate Rochín

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.


