De la métrica económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida: Propuesta feminista sobre el bienestar

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33064/36euph8892

Palabras clave:

bienestar, feminismos, justicia relacional, cuidados, interdependencia, políticas públicas

Resumen

Este artículo examina críticamente las teorías tradicionales del bienestar desde perspectivas feministas, argumentando que las concepciones dominantes — centradas en la autonomía individual, el ingreso económico y las métricas cuantitativas — reproducen jerarquías de género y exclusiones estructurales al asumir un sujeto abstracto y universal. Frente a esto, el trabajo muestra que las propuestas feministas no solo amplían las dimensiones consideradas relevantes para evaluar el bienestar, sino que transforman sus bases onto-epistémicas y normativasal situarlo en relaciones de interdependencia, cuidado y justicia social. A partir de undiálogo con autoras como Martha Nussbaum, Judith Butler e Ingrid Robeyns, asícomo con enfoques provenientes de la economía del cuidado y el ecofeminismo,argumento que el bienestar debe comprenderse como un proceso relacional ysituado, sostenido en vínculos de solidaridad, en la diversidad de cuerpos yexperiencias, y en la sostenibilidad de la vida en sus dimensiones materiales,simbólicas y ecológicas. Asimismo, analizo la traducción de estas perspectivas enpolíticas públicas, mostrando que la medición y el diseño institucional del bienestarimplican decisiones normativas que pueden ampliar o restringir las condiciones delo vivible. En este sentido, este trabajo propone entender el bienestar no como unestado fijo ni como una mera métrica evaluativa, sino como un horizonte políticocolectivo orientado a la ampliación de formas de vida dignas y a la construcción desociedades más justas, plurales y sostenibles.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Alba Marcela Zárate Rochín, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Posdoctorante. Faculta de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Citas

Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (2006). New foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Harvard University Press.

Alkire, S. (2016). The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy. In M. D. Adler & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy (pp. 615–644). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.18

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke university Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/597741

Bastia, T. (2014). Intersectionality, migration and development. Progress in development studies, 14(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414521330

Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. (2015). Gender, development and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107935

Bentham, J. (2000). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Batoche Books. (Trabajo original publicado en 1781)

Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & society, 24(5), 616-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142

Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017). Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j

Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750

Burnham, T. C., & Phelan, J. (2023). Biological welfare economics: A natural science critique of normative economics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 25(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-023-09333-x

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979

Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627

Butler, J. (2009). Performativity, precarity and sexual politics. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.040305

Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Harvard University Press.

Cabnal, L. (2010). Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya Yala. Momento de paro Tiempo de Rebelión, 116(3), 14-17. https://rosalux- ba.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/minervasfinal2PAGINAS.pdf

Chambers, C. P., & Echenique, F. (2025). Empirical welfare economics. Theoretical Economics, 20(3), 911-939. https://doi.org/10.3982/TE5845

Chant, S. (2016). Women, girls and world poverty: empowerment, equality or essentialism? International Development Planning Review, 38(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2016.1

Chappell, R., Meissner, D., & MacAskill, W. (2024). An Introduction to Utilitarianism: From Theory to Practice. Hackett Publishing.

Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual review of sociology, 41(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142

Coyle, D., Fabian, M., Beinhocker, E., Besley, T., & Stevens, M. (2023). Is it time to reboot welfare economics? Overview. Fiscal Studies, 44(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12334

Crenshaw, K. (1997). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against. The Legal Response to Violence Against Women, 5, 91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Crisp, R. (2002). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Mill on utilitarianism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203410615

De La Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1mmfspt

Duran, A., & Pérez II, D. (2019). The multiple roles of chosen familia: Exploring the interconnections of queer Latino men’s community culturalwealth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1523484

Dworkin, R. (2001). What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. In The notion of equality (pp. 81-142). Routledge. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2264894

Elson, D. (1999). Labor markets as gendered institutions: equality, efficiency and empowerment issues. World development, 27(3), 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00147-8

England, P., & Folbre, N. (1999). The cost of caring. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100103

Eschle, C. (2004). Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. American Anthropologist, 106(3), 627. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.627

Esquivel, V. (2014). What is a transformative approach to care, and why do we need it? Gender & Development, 22(3), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.963303

Esquivel, V. (2011). La economía del cuidado en América Latina. PNUD. https://evaluacionyseguimientoproyectosindesol.wordpress.com/wp- content/uploads/2015/09/ind15_atando_cabos.pdf

Federici, S. (2020). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. PM press.

Federici, S. (2018a). El patriarcado del salario. Críticas feministas al marxismo. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

Federici, S. (2018b). Re-enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. PM Press.

Fish, J. (2007). Getting equal: the implications of new regulations to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination for health and social care. Diversity and Equality in Health and Care, 4(3).

Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic literature, 47(4), 1029-1075. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.1029

Folbre, N. (2011). The invisible heart: Care and the global economy. En N. Kabeer & A. Stark (Eds.), The women, gender and development reader (pp. 41–42). London: Zed Books.

Folbre, N. (2005). Valuing Care: A Feminist Critique of Global Capitalism. In draft notes for presentation at Invited Session, Women's Worlds 2005 International Conference, Seoul Korea, June. https://aaws07.org/english3/speech/4.3.NancyFolber.pdf

Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Verso Books.

Fraser, N. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional approach to gender justice. Studies in social justice, 1(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v1i1.979

Fraser, N., & Lamas, M. (1991). La lucha por las necesidades: esbozo de una teoría crítica socialista-feminista de la cultura política del capitalismo tardío. Debate feminista, 3, 3-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42623971

Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. Women's Studies International Forum, 49, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004

Gatrell, C., Cooper, C. L., & Kossek, E. E. (2017). Maternal bodies as taboo at work: New perspectives on the marginalizing of senior-level women in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0034

Hajad, V., & Ikhsan, I. (2024). Ecofeminism as a movement: Choosing between economics and nature protection. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 15(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.1(29).09

Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on politics, 5(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065

Hands, D. W. (2012). The positive-normative dichotomy and economics. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, 13, 219-239. https://www.dwadehands.com/uploads/1/4/0/5/140531545/positive- normative_2012.pdf

Harcourt, W. (2023). The ethics and politics of care: reshaping economic thinking and practice. Review of Political Economy, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2023.2241395

Harsanyi, J. C. (1977). Rule utilitarianism and decision theory. Erkenntnis, 11(1), 25- 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169843

Harvey, J. T. (2010). Neoliberalism, neoclassicism and economic welfare. Journal of Economic Issues, 44(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624440208

Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2007). The philosophical foundations of mainstream normative economics. The philosophy of economics: an anthology, 226, 247. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.017

Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1984).

Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and empowerment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford development studies, 35(4), 379- 403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701897

Kittay, E. F. (2019). Love's labor: Essays on women, equality and dependency. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108926

Kittay, E. F. (2005). At the margins of moral personhood. Ethics, 116(1), 100-131.

Kittay, E. F. (2001). When caring is just and justice is caring: Justice and mental retardation. Public Culture, 13(3), 557-579. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/26257

Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

Little, I. M. D. (2002). A critique of welfare economics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198281191.001.0001

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-23

Cómo citar

Zárate Rochín, A. M. (2026). De la métrica económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida: Propuesta feminista sobre el bienestar. Euphyía, 19(36), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.33064/36euph8892