Social Scientific Knowledge about Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33064/49crscsh4554Keywords:
knowledge, science, knowledge society, social action, algorithmAbstract
Knowledge does not exist as an isolated "piece." Knowledge exists in an aggregated collective state. I define knowledge as a capacity for social action and as a model of reality, as the possibility of putting "something in motion", for example, solving a task, producing a material object such as a semiconductor chip, or being competent to prevent it from happening. something, for example, the appearance of a disease. In this sense, knowledge is a universal human phenomenon, or an anthropological constant. This definition of the term "knowledge" is indebted to Francis Bacon's famous observation that knowledge is power, a somewhat misleading translation of Bacon's Latin phrase: scientia potential est. A basic assumption should be that knowledge is not practical a priori. The transformation of knowledge as the ability to act into practical knowledge requires congenial circumstances, such as power or authority that dictates the concrete conditions for action. In this context, it is useful to ask about the increasingly prominent role of algorithms (intellectual technology) in relation to knowledge, such as the ChatGPT software, as well as the controversial question of the existence of a kind of knowledge and the notion of cultural capital.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abiteboul, S. y Dowek, G. (2020). The end of employment. En The Age of Algorithms (pp. 53–60). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108614139.007
Bacon, F. (1620/1960). Novum Organum. Liberal Arts Press.
Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C. y Timmis. J. (Eds.) (2021). Supersize Me: Intangibles and Industry Concentration. Draft working paper. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2020/preliminary/paper/iGtrhyEZ.
Barnes, B. (1977). Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Barnes, B. (1988). The Nature of Power. University of Illinois Press.
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and Ambivalence. Cornell University Press.
Becker, G. S. y Murphy, K. M. (1994). The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. En G. S. Becker (Ed.), Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3a ed., pp. 299–322). University of Chicago Press.
Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
Bernstein, B.(1961). Social Class and Linguistic Development: A Theory of Social Learning. En A.H. Haslsey, J. Floud y C. A. Anderson (Eds.), Education, economy and society (pp. 288–314). Free Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1973/2018). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. En Papers in the Sociology of Education (pp. 71–112). Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. En J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Davenport, T. H. y Miller, S. M. (Eds.) (2022). Working with AI. Real Stories of Human-Machine Collaboration. MIT Press.
Diamond, L. (2019). The Road to Digital Unfreedom: The Threat of Postmodern Totalitarianism. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0001
Drexl, J., Hilty, R. M., Beneke, F., Desaunettes, L., Finck, M., Globocnik, J., Gonzalez Otero, B., Hoffmann, J., Hollander, L., Kim, D., Richter, H., Scheuerer, S., Slowinski, P. R. y Thonemann, J. (2019). Technical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence: An Understanding from an Intellectual Property Law Perspective. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 19-13.
Drucker, P. F. (1950/1993). The New Society. The Anatomy of Industrial Order. Transaction Publishers.
Drucker, P. F. (1989/2003). The New Realities. With a new preface by the author. Transaction Publishers.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. HarperBusiness.
Drucker, P. F. (1994, noviembre). The social transformation. The Atlantic Monthly, 274, 53–80. https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/politics/ecbig/soctrans.htm
Felt, U. (2017). Making Knowledge, People, and Societies. En U. Felt (Ed.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 253–256). MIT Press.
Finn, E. (2019). The black box of the present: Time in the age of algorithms. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 86(2), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0027
Foucault, M. (1975/1977). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. Random House.
Foucault, M. (1977/1984). Truth and Power. En P. Rabinow (Ed.) The Foucault Reader (pp. 51–75). Pantheon Books.
Fuller, S. (2019). Against academic rentiership: A radical critique of the knowledge economy. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00035-0
Gehlen, A. (1957/1980). Man in the Age of Technology. Columbia University Press.
Gehlen, A. (1957). Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter. Sozialpsychologische Probleme in der industriellen Gesellschaft. Rowohlt.
Girasa, R. (2022). Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology. Economic Transformation and Government Regulation.
Hendrycks, D. (2023). Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans [arXiv preprint]. arXiv, 2303.16200. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.16200
Jennings, M. K. (1996). Political knowledge over time and across generations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.1086/297749
Kaplan, J. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
Kim, N. S. y Heshmati, A. (2019). The relationship between economic growth and democracy: Alternative representations of technological change. Panel Data Econometrics: Empirical Applications, 2019, 885–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815859-3.00028-7
Konings, M. y Adkins, L. (2022). Re-thinking the liquid core of capitalism with Hyman Minsky. Theory, Culture & Society 39(5), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764211070776
Korinek, A. y Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). Artificial intelligence and Its implications for income distribution and unemployment. En A, Agrawal, J. Gans y A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (pp. 323–390). University of Chicago Press.
Korinek, A. Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development. NBER Working Paper Series 28453. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28453
Korinek, A., Schindler, M. y Stiglitz, J. E. (2022) Technological progress and artificial intelligence. En V. Cerra, B. Eichengreen, A. El-Ganainy y M. Schindler (Eds.) How to Achieve Inclusive Growth (pp. 163–211). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846938.003.0005
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. Penguin Group.
Lee, F. y Larsen, L. B. (2019). How should we theorize algorithms? Five ideal types in analyzing algorithmic normativities. Big Data Society, 6(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719867349
Liebknecht, W. (1872/1891). Wissen ist Macht - Macht ist Wissen; Festrede gehalten zum Stiftungsfest des Dresdener Bildungsvereins am 5. Verlag der Expedition des Vorwärts.
Luhmann, N. (2011/2018). Organization and Decision. Cambridge University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1990). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1997/2013). Theory of Society. Stanford University Press.
MacKenzie, D. (2006). An Engine not a Camera: How financial models shape markets. MIT Press.
Marx, K. (1867/1967). Capital. Penguin.
Merton, R. K. (1942/1973). The Normative Structure of Science. En N. W. Storer (Ed.), The Sociology of Science (pp. 267–278). University of Chicago Press.
Merton, R. K. (1966). Dilemmas of democracy in the voluntary associations. American Journal of Nursing, 66(5), 1055–1061. https://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/Abstract/1966/05000/Dilemmas_of_Democracy_in_the_Voluntary_Association.39.aspx
Michels, R. (1911/1949). Political Parties. A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. The Free Press.
Miller, C. (2022). Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology. Scribner.
Mitchell, T. (2009). Carbon democracy. Economy and Society, 38(3), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598
Mokyr, J. (2002). The Gifts of Athena. Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton University Press.
Morgan, P. (1993). Capacity Building: An Overview. Workshop on Capacity Development, Institute on Governance.
Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. Clarendon Press.
Nowotny, H. (2021). In AI we Trust. Power, Illusion and Predictive Algorithms. Polity.
Ostrom, V. y Ostrom. E. (Ed.) (1977/2018). Public goods and public choices. En E. S. Savas (Ed.) Alternatives For Delivering Public Services (pp. 7–49). Routledge. https://spia.uga.edu/faculty_pages/tyler.scott/teaching/PADP6950_Fall2016_Thursday/readings/Ostrom_Ostrom_1977.pdf
Paras, E. (2006). Foucault 2.0. Beyond Power and Knowledge. Other Press.
Renn, O. (2019). Gefühlte Wahrheiten. Orientierung in Zeiten postfaktischer Verunsicherung. Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-3808%28199010%2998%3A5%3CS71%3AETC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8
Rosanvallon, P. (2011/2013). The society of equals. Harvard University Press.
Rothschild, K. W. (1971). Power in Economics. Penguin.
Schelsky, H. (1975). Die Arbeit tun die anderen. Klassekampf und Priesterherrschaft der Intellektuellen. Westdeutscher Verlag.
Shannon, C. (1949). Communication theory of secrecy systems. Bell System Technical Journal.
Simmel, G. (1890/1989). Über sociale Differenzierung. En Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe 2 (pp. 109-295). Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (1907/1978). The Philosophy of Money. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Simmel, G. (1919/1968). The Conflict in Modern Culture and Other Essays. Teachers College Press.
Smith, B. C. (2019). The Promise of Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press.
Smith, P. H. (2022). From Livid Experience to Written Word. Reconstructing Practical Knowledge in the Early Modern World. University of Chicago Press.
Stehr, N. (1992). Practical Knowledge. Sage.
Stehr, N. (2000). The Productivity Paradox: ICTs, Knowledge, and the Labour Market. En M. T. Adolf (Ed.), Nico Stehr: Pioneer in the Theory of Society and Knowledge ( pp. 255–272). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stehr, N. (2006). Knowledge Politics: Governing the Consequences of Science and Technology. Routledge.
Stehr, N. (2016). Information, Power, and Democracy. Liberty is a Daughter of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Stehr, N. (2021). Practical knowledge or the virtues of John M. Keynes’ General Theory. Sociologia, 55(2), 121-124.
Stehr, N. (2022). Knowledge Capitalism. Routledge.
Stehr, N. (2023). Understanding Knowledge and Society. Edward Elgar.
Stopforth, S. y Gayle, V. (2022). Parental social class and GCSE attainment: Re-reading the role of ‘cultural capital’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(5), 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2045185
Tichenor. P. J., Donohue, G. A. y Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1086/267786
Tubadji, A., Gheasi, M., Crociata, A. y Odoardi. I. (2022). Cultural capital and income inequality across Italian regions. Regional Studies, 56(3), 459–475 https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1950913
Weber, M. (1921/1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Bedminster Press.
Willke, H. (2001). Die Krisis des Wissens. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 26, 3–26.
Wolf, M. (2023). The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. Allen Lane.
Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing algorithms: Myth, mess, and methods. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915608948
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nico Stehr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
El lector es libre de compartir o adaptar el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo las condiciones siguientes: (a) debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios; (b) no puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial y (c) si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Resumen de la licencia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es_ES
Texto completo de la licencia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Cada autor es responsable del contenido de su artículo. En el caso de un texto colectivo, el primer autor asume la responsabilidad intelectual de los resultados del proceso editorial; los autores son responsables de obtener la licencia de autor para reproducir materiales gráficos o fotográficos que pertenecen a terceros.
Los autores asumen plena responsabilidad en el caso de falsificación de datos o falta de autenticidad en la investigación. Se comprometen, también, a no reutilizar trabajos ya publicados, total o parcialmente, para presentarlos en otra publicación.
Estas condiciones aplican tanto a la versión impresa como a la versión electrónica de la revista.